Women in Combat
Feb. 25th, 2011 09:38 pmWith the controversy over allowing women in combat, in the US military, I was wondering how that works on Atlantis. Can anyone point me in the direction of fic that addresses the issue of those women (such as Sam Carter, Laura Cadman, Alicia Vega, Anne Teldy, and others) being in what really must be considered a combat zone. Is the SGC exempt? Is it an experimental situation? What's the deal?
Any pairing or rating ok, but please warn for het.
Any pairing or rating ok, but please warn for het.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-26 05:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-26 08:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-26 03:18 pm (UTC)So, the SG teams that are specifically Combat (SG-3, SG-5, etc) would have to follow the rules but the science, diplomatic, medical, first contact, exploration, etc teams can all have women in them.
For instance a medical helicopter pilot can still fly medivac, Pilots can fly Refullers, Transport drops, high altitude recon, etc (Basically if the primary job of the unit is combat and the odds of being shot down are high then a woman isn't suppose to be in the unit but if combat is secondary or the risk low then woman are in those units).
(I have served as a female Marine and though I got out prior to Sept 11th, I know a few of my fellow recruits who stayed in and have driven outside the green zones for supply reasons and one of my roommates, also a communications related MOS, who has laid optic lines in an area that became front lines while she was working)
Course this is the rules on EARTH where the Pentagon has to answer to the public.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-26 03:27 pm (UTC)So the IOA probably has no restriction. So any US military personnel stationed in Atlantis would fall under IOA per-view and probably consider Atlantis a green zone equivalent, exploration post with combat possibility.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-26 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-26 10:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-26 10:26 pm (UTC)If you like military related fic, and aren't just looking for woman in combat, I wrote a woman in the military one:
http://hoshi-reed.livejournal.com/110471.html
no subject
Date: 2011-02-26 10:47 pm (UTC)I was always support, I was a 3rd echelon tech (the type that require in-depth dismantling of equipment that isn't quick swap and shouldn't be done where the equipment could get wet or dirty or exposed to sand, dust or too much sun). This kind of support isn't deployed on the front lines but I've gone to boot camp with other females that later became supply, cooks, operators (radio, telephone, etc), and a bunch more. In fact my room mate, also a tech, was 2nd echelon (regular repair) unit and would be sent out to repair optic lines anywhere (lines can't be brought in to be repaired, they must be repaired in the field), including in areas that were "unsafe".
Supply units of course handle the logistics of items and they sometimes have to track and/or transport which can lead to areas that can see combat. Not to mention that Front lines is hard to define nowadays. There are no enemy lines vs troops and it is safe for those in the "rear". Road sides or your own mess hall can be dangerous even in "green zones".
But officially, woman can't be stationed in a combat unit (whose sole purpose is to fight) nor hold jobs of that type (Artillery and Infantry).
(My officer POV isn't as knowledgeable so though I know that woman have flown combat missions/hours in planes and helos I'm not sure about their official on paper units classifications or if it is still restricted)
no subject
Date: 2011-02-26 10:54 pm (UTC)I always wondered how the Pentagon explains all the female soldiers going home in body bags to the public, to be honest. I mean, if exluding them from combat also excludes them from being POWs and coming home in body bags... why does that still happen? (and I'm absolutely not criticising you but those people in the Pentagon who think excluding women from combat makes any sense).
BTW, what about Female Engagement Teams? Those teams have been in combat a lot (at least that's what I gathered from reading about them...) but officially they never saw any combat since women are excluded from combat... maybe it works a bit like that in Atlantis (and also the SGC, since Carter should never have been allowed to go on missions with SG1)? With a lot of
bullshittalking around and some smoke screens and weird terminology?no subject
Date: 2011-02-26 11:48 pm (UTC)As to female engagement teams in Atlantis, The Pentagon only restricts the type of job and unit. So an EOD can't be assigned to say, a direct recon or ranger unit because that is combat. BUT they can be "lent" to the Secret Service which can then deploy to a combat area under the rules of the Secret Service. The Pendagon can't restrict the Secret Service from using the person once they are integrated to the unit. So, basically all Atlantis personnel are under IOA control and rules.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 12:00 am (UTC)Thought so. Is there any indication that this might change in the next couple of years (since, effectively, women are serving in combat, whether the Pentagon admits to it or not)? It's kind of surprising (to me, anyway) that DADT was repealed before the combat exclusion ban is lifted, actually :S
The Pendagon can't restrict the Secret Service from using the person once they are integrated to the unit. So, basically all Atlantis personnel are under IOA control and rules.
Okay, that sounds logical (kind of twisted but logical). So that's an explanation that could work if you wanted to keep it still somewhat realistic and have female soldiers working in what's effectively if not officially combat roles (I'm asking since I have a ton of Laura Cadman stories and stories with female military OCs on 'Gate teams etc.)?
no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 12:02 am (UTC)The SG teams all have purposes.
SG-1 is designated exploration.
There are Military teams, Combat teams, Medical teams, Science teams, diplomatic, Engineering, Archeological, Survey, etc.
Carter has been acknowledged as flying over 100 hours in Enemy Air Space during the Gulf War per Children of the Gods. Basically it is the same thing.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 12:20 am (UTC)This also could explain how SGT Stackhouse was the team leader canon wise and Cadman NOT lead it even though he is enlisted and she is an officer
no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 12:27 am (UTC)Actually, I don't have Cadman on a team at all (at least in the main 'verse), rather as someone who's lent to teams if needed. But yeah, your idea also sounds like a great work around (and quite honestly, I think canon could have done with a few non-American led teams as well ;)).
This also could explain how SGT Stackhouse was the team leader canon wise and Cadman NOT lead it even though he is enlisted and she is an officer
Oh, is he really her team leader? Since I always had the impression that canon also didn't have her permanently on a team, rather attached to them on a temporary basis (or maybe that was not the way in Duet, only in Critical Mass?).
no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 12:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 12:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 12:43 am (UTC)I think the canon explanation is ALL Atlantis personnel not officially there and therefore not under Pentagon rules. The paper trail ends their official duty station on earth/paper at (Petterson, McMurdo, Norad, etc) and what counts is Deep Space Radar Telemetry or what ever they list as the cover unit.
Given the SG and AR teams don't exist, they can't break any rules by placing women on them. Or the IOA/SGC considers that if civilians are allowed (currently civilians are not allowed to be deployed in combat units on earth) then woman are too.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 12:48 am (UTC)There is something about looking at something like statistics and using logic to interpret or express what you want. I was also debate team in high school and won arguments I don't personally believe in (Pro-Life for instance).
I've debated the Bible and turned it upside down and sent someone crying I'm THAT annoying/skilled at this.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-27 02:14 am (UTC)